Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar a capacidade da PET/CT FDG detectar a zona epileptogênica, com injeção da FDG realizada tanto no período interictal como perto de uma crise epiléptica. Materiais e Métodos: Foram avaliados pacientes com epilepsia de difícil controle que realizaram PET/CT FDG. A zona epileptogênica foi definida pelo follow up/anatomopatológico ou eletroencefalogramas (EEGs) seriados, telemetria e ressonância magnética. PET/CT FDG foi realizada independentemente se o paciente tinha crise epiléptica durante a monitoração com EEG ou no período interictal. Os resultados foram definidos como concordantes ou discordantes, comparando com a zona epileptogênica. Resultados: Foram incluídos no estudo 110 pacientes: 10 no grupo pós-ictal (injeção de FDG depois da crise) e 100 no grupo interictal. A PET/CT FDG foi concordante com a zona epileptogênica em nove pacientes do grupo pós-ictal (90%) e 60 pacientes do grupo interictal (60%). Entre os nove pacientes concordantes do grupo pós-ictal, quatro mostraram hipermetabolismo (44,4%) e cinco mostraram hipometabolismo na zona epileptogênica (55,6%). Conclusão: Nossos resultados confirmaram que a PET/CT FDG é uma ferramenta útil na localização da zona epileptogênica e a monitoração com EEG é muito importante para correlacionar os achados. Além disso, PET/CT FDG realizada no período pós-ictal é capaz de identificar a zona epileptogênica, mostrando tanto hipometabolismo como hipermetabolismo.

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18F-FDG PET/CT) in localizing epileptogenic zones, comparing 18F-FDG injection performed in the traditional interictal period with that performed near the time of a seizure. Materials and Methods: We evaluated patients with refractory epilepsy who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT. The reference standards for localization of the epileptogenic zone were histopathology and follow-up examinations (in patients who underwent surgery) or serial electroencephalography (EEG) recordings, long-term video EEG, and magnetic resonance imaging (in patients who did not). The 18F-FDG injection was performed whether the patient had an epileptic seizure during the EEG monitoring period or not. The 18F-FDG PET/CT results were categorized as concordant or discordant with the reference standards. Results: Of the 110 patients evaluated, 10 were in a postictal group (FDG injection after a seizure) and 100 were in the interictal group. The 18F-FDG PET/CT was concordant with the reference standards in nine (90%) of the postictal group patients and in 60 (60%) of the interictal group patients. Among the nine postictal group patients in whom the results were concordant, the 18F-FDG PET/CT showed hypermetabolism and hypometabolism in the epileptogenic zone in four (44.4%) and five (55.6%), respectively. Conclusion: Our data indicate that 18F-FDG PET/CT is a helpful tool for localization of the epileptogenic zone and that EEG monitoring is an important means of correlating the findings. In addition, postictal 18F-FDG PET/CT is able to identify the epileptogenic zone by showing either hypometabolism or hypermetabolism.

Abstract Background and objective During the past few years, an increased number of postpartum hemorrhages have been noticed, even in high-income countries. It has been suggested that this escalation could be associated with increased obstetric interventions. Among such interventions, anesthesia is one of the most prevalent. The present study aimed to investigate the influence of peripartum anesthesia on total blood loss during the 24 hours after delivery. Methods We performed a complementary analysis from a prospective cohort study that evaluated postpartum bleeding within 24 hours after birth. The study was performed between February 1st, 2015 and March 31st, 2016 at the Women’s Hospital at the Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil. Postpartum bleeding was measured using a calibrated drape and summing the blood contained in the compresses and pads used for 24 hours. We calculated means, percentages, and standard deviation and performed Mann-Whitney analysis for the relation of anesthesia with Postpartum Hemorrhage (PPH) and logistic regression for drugs used in the anesthesia with PPH, using SAS 9.4 software. Results We included 270 women in the study; of these, 168 received anesthesia for delivery and almost 50% of them had spinal and epidural anesthesia. The mean blood loss within 24 hours after delivery did not show differences between those who did and those who did not receive obstetrical anesthesia (579.0 ± 361.6 vs. 556.6 ± 360.6; p = 0.57). Logistic regression showed that anesthesia, the type of anesthesia, and the drug used did not influence the PPH above 500 mL and above 1000 mL within 2 hours (p > 0.05). Conclusion Anesthesia did not influence postpartum bleeding after vaginal delivery.